This syllabus supercedes all previous versions of this autostudy.
(Adapted from Prof. Frances Harmon’s original syllabus.)
|

|
HIS
410Z ROMAN HISTORY
|
Course Objectives (with associated baccalaureate Learning Outcomes/Performance
Indicators):
- To explain in writing the
distinctive character of ancient Rome
(LO/PI: D2-3)
- To document how Roman history
changed through the centuries (LO/PI: A3,D4,F2)
- To evaluate and appreciate
Roman contributions to western civilization (LO/PI: C2, E1-2,F3-4)
Required Texts: The following textbooks are easily available in
paperback reprints for purchase. All ancient titles mentioned in the reading
assignments below are readily available from the MSJ library (third floor stacks
in the 870s and 880s), OhioLINK, or any public library.
Barrow, R. H., The Romans (Penguin 1949)
Rostovtzeff, M., Rome
(Oxford 1960)
Wiesner, et al., Discovering the Western Past vol. 1 chap. 3
(Houghton-Mifflin 1989) - to be used as the basis for the final project of the
course. (See instructor.)
Overview of Course Content: The history of Rome traditionally begins with its founding
in the mid-eighth century BCE when it was a small city-state politically and
culturally dominated by the nearby Etruscans. At the end of the sixth century
BCE the Etruscan monarchy was ousted in favor of a republican form of
government ruled by Roman aristocrats. Rome
then embarked on a long process of military and economic expansion first
throughout Italy
and southwestern Europe, then northern Africa and Greece, and after that western
Europe and the Middle East. Rome eventually found itself ruler of the
entire Mediterranean basin at the end of the first century BCE. But by this
point Rome had been thoroughly transformed socially by the influence of
non-aristocrats and the power of the army, culturally by the infusion of ideas
from Greece
and the east, and politically by the emergence of an imperial style of
government under the emperors. By the beginning of the fourth century CE this
process of transformation even included the adoption of Christianity as the
emperor’s personal religion and the founding of a "new Rome," Constantinople,
as co-capital in the east. The fifth century CE saw the fall of the city of Rome and the collapse of
its empire in the west.
Course Format and Student Responsibilities: The student should be
aware that autostudies require a great deal of self-discipline to complete the
reading and writing assignments for the course. It is for this reason that this
autostudy is not open at all to traditional-aged freshmen or sophomores.
Traditional-aged juniors and seniors may take it for elective credit only.
Adult learners can use it to fulfill Liberal Arts and Sciences requirements in
Humanities. Enrollment is limited to a maximum of two students per term. All
assignments are to be completed by the Monday of final exam week. No grades of
incomplete will be given.
The student will read the two works by Rostovtzeff and Barrow as basic
texts. Both are generally considered classics in the field of ancient Roman
studies and remain useful despite their age. (If desired, the student may find
material to update the early chapters of Rostovtzeff in Cornell, T. J., The
Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars c.
1000-264 BC (Routledge 1995).) These two texts will be supplemented by
readings from ancient sources in translation. Most of these primary sources
have been chosen with a biographical focus in mind.
All written assignments are to be typed in a double-spaced, 12-point font
with standard margins, and will be of two kinds, as follows: 1) Below, the
student will find three sets of questions to be answered covering the reading
materials. The written response to each numbered question
in a set should be about one full page in length. As these constitute the
majority of the student’s written output, it is suggested that the student hand
in one set every three or four weeks to maintain a manageable pace for
completing assignments. 2) The final project based on Wiesner chapter 3,
"The Achievements of Augustus," is an exercise in historiography
which should be about five pages in length and begun well before the end of the
term. (See below.) Do not turn in
your assignments all at once at the end of term. Submit them as you
complete them.
Reading
Assignments: The following readings have been arranged in 15 groups roughly
corresponding to a week’s worth of reading over a semester.
- Barrow chapters 1 and 2 for an
introduction to the idealized Roman character and values, and an
introductory sketch of Roman history. Livy book I.1-31 for the traditional
tale of Rome’s
founding and monarchy (originally written in Latin).
- Rostovtzeff chapters 1 and 2
for a discussion of our sources and a modern view of Rome’s beginnings (originally written in
Russian). Livy book I.32-60 for the conclusion of the traditional tale of
the period of the kings and their overthrow.
- Rostovtzeff chapters 3 and 4
for developments within early republican Rome and relations with its Italian
neighbors. Dionysius Halicarnassus book X.5-8, 16-19, 24-25, 27, 30; book
XI.2-4.1 for the life of Lucius Quintius Cincinnatus (originally written
in Greek).
- Rostovtzeff chapter 5 and 6
for Rome’s
entrance into the wider Mediterranean area. Cornelius Nepos, Hannibal,
and Cato for profiles of Rome’s
greatest enemy and staunchest defender (originally written in Latin).
- Rostovtzeff chapters 7 and 8
for how Rome’s
overseas conquests were affecting Roman culture. Polybius book VI.1-18,
43-58 for a description of the Roman republican constitution and a
comparison of it with others (originally written in Greek).
- Barrow chapter 3 for the
effect foreign—especially Greek—influences in the growing empire were
having at Rome.
Polybius book VI.19-42 for the Roman military practices which were the
source of Rome’s
strength.
- Rostovtzeff chapters 9 and 10
for the growing social and political chaos at Rome and the rise of strongman politics.
Plutarch, Life of Tiberius Gracchus, and Life of Gaius Gracchus
for profiles of two would-be reformers (originally written in Greek).
- Rostovtzeff chapters 11 and
12 for the period of the first and second triumvirates and the death of
the republic. Sallust, Conspiracy of Catiline for an account of a
nasty, ultimately thwarted revolutionary (originally written in Latin).
- Rostovtzeff chapters 13 and
14, and Barrow chapter 4 for the restoration of peace and the birth of the
principate. Dio Cassius book XLII.34-45.1; book XLIII.27; book XLVIII.24,
27-28; book XLIX.31-34, 40-41; book L.1-6.1, 15, 23-26; book LI.5-6, 10-16
for Cleopatra, her relations with Caesar and Antony, and final downfall
(originally written in Greek).
- Rostovtzeff chapter 15, and
Barrow chapters 5 through 7 for Roman culture at the time of Augustus.
Tacitus, Annals book I for the transition to the reign of Tiberius
upon the death of Augustus (originally written in Latin).
- Rostovtzeff chapter 16 for
period of the Julio-Claudian dynasty after Augustus. Suetonius, Life of
Nero for the scandalous end of the Julio-Claudians (originally written
in Latin).
- Rostovtzeff chapters 17
through 19 for the period of the Flavian and Antonine imperial dynasties.
Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Hadrian for a biography of this
period’s most outstanding emperor (originally written in Latin).
- Rostovtzeff chapters 20 and
21 for the social history of the Flavian and Antonine periods and the
anarchy of the third century CE. Herodian book I for the profligate life
of the emperor Commodus (originally written in Greek).
- Rostovtzeff chapters 22 and
23, and Barrow chapters 8 and 9 for the radical transformation and
orientalization of the empire after the period of anarchy. Eusebius, Life
of Constantine book I.1-32 for a profile of Constantine and his insertion of
Christianity into Roman politics (originally written in Greek).
- Rostovtzeff chapters 24 and
25, and Barrow chapters 10 and 11 for the final Christianization of the
empire and the barbarian capture of Rome.
Eusebius, Life of Constantine book I.33-59 for the continuation of Constantine’s early
reign.
Questions on Reading
Assignments 1-6: Answer these after reading Rostovtzeff chapters 1 through
8, Barrow chapters 1 through 3, and ancient selections from Livy, Dionysius
Halicarnassus, Cornelius Nepos, and Polybius.
- How do Rostovtzeff and Barrow
describe the founding of Rome
and how do they differ from Livy’s version? Who is more credible? Why?
- Both Rostovtzeff and Barrow
are more favorable toward Etruscan contributions to Roman civilization
than Livy. What is Livy’s account of the Etruscan expulsion from Rome? Contrast
Livy’s story with Rostovtzeff and Barrow and also list some Etruscan
contributions to Rome.
- What was the nature of Roman
religion originally? How was it influenced by the Etruscans? By the
Greeks?
- What enemies did the Roman
republic face in Italy?
What policies did Rome
enact regarding defeated territories? What consequences did these policies
eventually have on Rome?
On conquered lands?
- Describe the checks and
balances in the Roman constitution which made it workable for centuries
and admired today. What impressed Polybius about it?
- Describe the difference
between a patrician and a plebeian. What concessions were eventually made
to the plebeian class and why?
- How does Cincinnatus exhibit
traditional Roman values? Illustrate with examples from Dionysius
Halicarnassus. What was his appeal to later generations?
- What were the major
differences between the Roman and Carthaginian civilizations? Why was the
Second Punic War so decisive for western history?
- How was Scipio Africanus not
a traditional Roman general? Compare the personalities of Scipio
Africanus, Hannibal, and Cato the Elder. Use, in part, Cornelius Nepos’
biography in your answer. Who or what gets the blame for Hannibal’s ultimate defeat?
- What was the Roman rationale
for becoming involved in Greek politics? What were the consequences of
this involvement? Give specific examples.
- Give two reasons why the year
146 BCE is so decisive in Roman history.
- After reading Livy’s book I,
what is your impression of the role and status of the Roman and non-Roman
women he describes?
Questions on Reading
Assignments 7-10: Answer these after reading Rostovtzeff chapters 9 through
15, Barrow chapters 4 through 7, and the ancient selections from Plutarch,
Sallust, and Dio Cassius.
- Discuss the changing nature
of agricultural policy in Italy
as a result of Roman expansionism. What consequences did these changes
have on the average Roman citizen? The army? The wealthier citizen?
- Who were the Gracchi brothers
and what were their intended reforms? How successful were they? What were
the far-reaching consequences of their actions? Use, in part, Plutarch’s
biography of them in your answer.
- Why is Marius’ appointment as
consul in 107 BCE significant? How was Marius’ army different from Roman
armies of the past? Why is this a turning point in the history of the
republic?
- Compare Marius and Sulla in
personality and political views and discuss the nature and extent of their
conflict with each other.
- What is your opinion of the
threat that Catiline posed to the republic? Use, in part, Sallust’s
history in your answer. How is Catiline a symbol of his time?
- How was the second
triumvirate unlike the first triumvirate? What caused its demise?
- Discuss the personality and
role of Cicero
in the politics of the late republic. What was his relationship with
Julius Caesar? What was the cause of his death? What makes him so well
known even today?
- Compare Augustus Caesar with
Julius Caesar and give reasons why Augustus succeeded where Julius failed.
- What was the reason why
Cleopatra was so vilified by Augustus Caesar and most Romans? Was this
justified? What was the nature of her involvement with Julius Caesar and
then Antony?
Use, in part, Dio Cassius’ history in your answer.
- Describe what you see as the
best part of Roman literary and philosophical life during the late
republic and early principate. Explain your reasoning. What effect did
this have on later western civilization?
Questions on Reading
Assignments 11-15: Answer these after reading Rostovtzeff chapters 16-25,
Barrow chapters 8 through 11, and the ancient selections from Tacitus,
Suetonius, Scriptores Historiae Augustae, Herodian, and Eusebius.
- Discuss the competence of the
Julio-Claudian emperors who succeeded Augustus. How do they compare to
Augustus? Would you consider any of them successful as emperors? Explain.
- What was the role of the
praetorian guard in governing the empire and choosing the emperors? Give
examples.
- What qualities did the five
"good emperors" of the Antonine age possess that the
Julio-Claudians and Flavians after Augustus lacked? How did they deal with
the succession problem? Use, in part, Hadrian's biography in the Scriptores
Historiae Augustae in your answer.
- Compare and contrast the
lives of middle and upper class Romans living in the first two centuries
of the Roman empire with the Romans of
the early republic.
- What spiritual vacuum did the
mystery religions fill that the established state religion of Rome could not? What
did the mystery religions have in common with Christianity?
- The pax romana, or
Roman peace, began with Augustus and ended with the death of the last
Severan emperor. Why? What parallels do you see between the period of the
early third-century CE and the last century of the Roman republic? Use, in
part, Herodian’s history in your answer.
- What were the political,
economic, and social problems of the third-century CE that caused such
turmoil? How were they interrelated?
- Why is Diocletian considered
to have been the savior of the empire? What were some of his reforms? Were
they effective? Explain.
- How did Constantine and
Diocletian differ on religious policy? What is the significance of Constantine’s
conversion? Use, in part, Eusebius in your answer.
- What are some of the various
theories given for the fall of the Roman empire?
What is the significance of the date 476 CE?
- Why did the eastern part of
the Roman empire survive to become the Byzantine empire?
- Why is Roman law considered
so significant a contribution to western civilization?
Final Written Project (at least five pages): For this exercise in
historiography (the writing of history), read through Wiesner vol. 1 chap. 3
"The Achievements of Augustus" with this thought in mind:
"Augustus Caesar is remembered for having
worked a change in the Roman state so fundamental that historians refer to the
Roman republic before him and to the Roman empire
after him."
Your task is to evaluate what the above statement means. What were Augustus’
main achievements? How did he transform the republic into empire? How did he
use Roman tradition, his political power, public opinion?
Also, how objective are our sources? How do we reconcile conflicting
opinions? When analyzing historical change, how important is the process of analysis
to the results?
